Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:37
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Israel is accused of the gravest war crimes in Gaza - BBC
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
I dreamt my mother had died and I cried so much in my dream. What does it mean?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
This group is the most vulnerable to heat-related illnesses by far - The Washington Post
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Tomato Recall Escalates to Highest Health Risk Alert—Here’s What You Need to Know - Real Simple
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
2 Minnesota lawmakers shot in apparent 'targeted' incident: Officials - ABC News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do all Koreans look like K-pop idols?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Google Photos albums redesign adds Material 3 Expressive toolbar, QR code sharing - 9to5Google